بررسی آزمایشگاهی اثر هوش اخلاقی بر سواری رایگان: رهیافت بازی پویا با اطلاعات کامل
محورهای موضوعی : اقتصاد کار و جمعیت
ام البنین جلالی
1
(دانشجوی دوره دکتری دانشگاه یزد)
زهرا نصراللهی
2
(هیات علمی دانشگاه یزد)
مجید هاتفی
3
(دانشجوی دوره دکتری دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان)
کلید واژه: طبقه‌بندی JEL: D23 J41, M52, . واژگان کلیدی: هوش اخلاقی, نظریه بازی‌ها, مطالعه آزمایشگاهی, اقتصاد رفتاری,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف این مقاله بررسی میزان اثرپذیری سواری رایگان از هوش اخلاقی است. بدین منظور با فراهم کردن یک محیط آزمایشگاهی و یک نمونه 186 نفره از جامعه مورد نظر (دانشجویان دانشگاه‌های یزد و آیت‌الله حائری میبد)، یک بازی تیمی سه‌نفره دومرحله‌ای طراحی شد. نتایج نشان داد هوش اخلاقی تأثیر معناداری بر سواری رایگان دارد. درواقع، افزایش هوش اخلاقی موجب کاهش سواری رایگان می‌شود. بر اساس نتایج پیشنهاد می‌شود که در جذب نیروی کار در مشاغل دولتی و خصوصی میزان هوش اخلاقی افراد مدنظر قرار گیرد؛ علاوه براین برای ارتقای هوش اخلاقی کارکنان طوری برنامه‌ریزی شود تا از این طریق مشارکت در نیروی کار و در نتیجه بهره‌وری افزایش یابد.
The purpose of this article is to investigate the effect of moral intelligence on free riding. To this end, a two-stage team game with three individuals was designed by providing an experimental environment and a sample of 186 people from the target community (students from Yazd and Ayatollah Haeri Meybod). The results showed that moral intelligence has a significant effect on free riding. In fact, increasing moral intelligence reduces free riding. Based on the results, it is suggested that the level of moral intelligence should be considered in attracting workforce in public and private jobs; in addition, it is intended to promote the moral intelligence of employee in order to increase participation in the work and, consequently, productivity.
منابع
- Akerlof, G. A., & Kranton, R. E. (2000). Economics and identity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3): 715-753.
- Arfara, C., & Samanta, I. (2016). The impact of emotional intelligence on improving team-working: the case of Public Sector (National Centre for Public Administration and Local Government-NCPALG). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 230: 167-175.
- Ayoko, O. B., & Callan, V. J. (2010). Teams’ reactions to conflict and teams’ task and social outcomes: The moderating role of transformational and emotional leadership. European Management Journal, 28(3): 220-235.
- Ayoub, A. E. A., & Aljughaiman, A. M. (2016). A predictive structural model for gifted students' performance: A study based on intelligence and its implicit theories. Learning and Individual Differences, 51: 11-18.
- Bernard, M., Hett, F., & Mechtel, M. (2016). Social identity and social free-riding. European Economic Review, 90: 4-17.
- Blanchard, E. J., & Olney, W. W. (2017). Globalization and human capital investment: Export composition drives educational attainment. Journal of International Economics, 106: 165-183.
- Borba, M. (2005). the step- by-step plan to building moral intelligence. Nurturing Kids Heart& Souls. National Educator Award, National council of Self-esteem. Jossey-Bass.
- Clarken, R. H. (2009). Moral intelligence in the schools. Online Submission.
- Dutton, E., & Lynn, R. (2014). Regional differences in intelligence and their social and economic correlates in Finland. Mankind Quarterly, 54(3/4): 447.
- Fontaine, P. (2014). Free riding. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 36(3): 359-376.
- Gächter, S. (2012). In the lab and the field: Punishment is rare in equilibrium. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(1): 26-28.
- Gedney, C.R., (1999). Leadership Effectiveness and Gender. Air Command and Staff College. Air University Maxwell Air Force Base.
- Gomes, C.M. A., Golino, H. F., &Menezes, I. G. (2014). Predicting school achievement rather than intelligence: Does metacognition matter? Psychology, 5:1095–1110.
- Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 13(162): 1243–1248.
- Hebert, E. B. (2010). The relationship between emotional intelligence, transformational leadership, and effectiveness in school principals. Georgia State University.
- Hippe, R., & Perrin, F. (2017). Gender equality in human capital and fertility in the European regions in the past Investigaciones. De Historia Economical. 13: 166-179.
- Jones, B. F. (2014). The human capital stock: a generalized approach. The American Economic Review, 104(11): 3752-3777.
- Jung, J. H., & Chang, D. R. (2017). Types of creativity—Fostering multiple intelligences in design convergence talents. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23: 101-111.
- Kappe, R., & Van der Flier, H. (2012). Predicting academic success in higher education: what’s more important than being smart?. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27(4): 605-619.
- Klor, E. F., Kube, S., & Winter, E. (2014). Can higher rewards lead to less effort? Incentive reversal in teams. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 97: 72-83.
- Korzilius, H., Bücker, J. J., & Beerlage, S. (2017). Multiculturalism and innovative work behavior: The mediating role of cultural intelligence. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 56: 13-24.
- Lanoszka, A. (2015). Do allies really free ride?. Survival, 57(3), 133-152.
- Lee, J. (2010). Cognitive science: Interdisciplinary convergence & applications. Seoul: Sungkyunkwan University Press.
- Lennick, D., & Kiel, F. (2006). Moral intelligence for successful leadership. Leader to Leader, 2006(40): 13-16.
- Lennick, D., & Kiel, F. (2011). Moral intelligence 2.0: Enhancing business performance and leadership success in turbulent times. Pearson Prentice Hall.
- Lucas Jr, R. E. (2015). Human capital and growth. The American Economic Review, 105(5): 85-88.
- McClain, M. C., & Pfeiffer, S. (2012). Identification of gifted students in the United States today: A look at state definitions, policies, and practices. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 28(1): 59-88.
- Nielsen, U. H., Tyran, J. R., & Wengström, E. (2014). Second thoughts on free riding. Economics Letters, 122(2): 136-139.
- Nisbett, R. E. (2009). Intelligence and how to get it: Why schools and cultures count. New York, NY: Norton.
- Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Rahimi, G. R. (2011). The Implication of Moral Intelligence and Effectiveness in Organization; Are They Interrelated?. International Journals of Marketing and Technology, 1(4): 67-76.
- Rand, D. G., Newman, G. E., & Wurzbacher, O. M. (2015). Social context and the dynamics of cooperative choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 28(2): 159-166.
- Worrell, F. C. (2009). Myth 4: A single test score or indicator tells us all we need to know about giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53:242–244.
- Zak, Paul J. (2011). Moral markets. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 77(2): 212-233.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research,vol(no): 39-50.
_||_